Marketplace - American Public Media

If you have debt that's getting you down, don't worry.  You're not alone. Take a look at these eye-popping statistics from the website NerdWallet.com about the amount of debt American households carry:

• Average credit card debt: $15,162
• Average mortgage debt: $147,967
• Average student loan debt: $33,445

Of course, money woes and music go hand-in-hand and artists have been singing about debt since the first borrower defaulted on a loan.  While you're trying to collect the money your cousin owes you or worrying about whether that's a debt collector ringing your phone, just breathe and enjoy our playlist of songs about debt.  There are some hits on there -- like "Bills, Bills, Bills" by Destiny's Child. I mean, who  wouldn't like this lyric: "You triflin', good for nothing type of brother." Plus, we have some personal favorites from our staff in the playlist, like "Busted" by Ray Charles (our host Barbara Boagaev loves that song!). Take a listen and enjoy the music.

If you have ideas for songs about debt that we missed, please leave us a comment below or Tweet us @radiopiggybank #DebtJams.

Paying for college has practically become synonymous with financial ruin.  

We've all heard the stories of graduates toiling at minimum wage jobs at best, weighed down by student loan debt.

That's given rise to a new strand of conventional wisdom that warns young people to steer clear of borrowing for college. The message: College isn't worth it! You don't want to join the ranks of debt-slaves with a diploma!
 
Hold on a minute. We know few students these days can afford college without borrowing some money, but the average student loan balance is about $24,000. And the median is around $13,000. These are onerous sums for newly minted college graduates in a lousy economy, but they're far from catastrophic.

Throughout our history the American dream has often come with a loan repayment schedule. The Pilgrims were able to settle in Plymouth, Mass., only because they were backed by London merchant bankers.

My fear is that the student loan scare stories will persuade young people to steer clear of college, especially those from low-income families.

Bottom line -- college remains the best investment most people will ever make in their lifetime. Case in point: graduates earn some 50 percent more than their peers with only a high school diploma.

Don't get me wrong. The financial aid system cries for reform. Many college graduates are hurting and tragically, some have borrowed more than they can ever repay. However, the student loan debts will eventually pay off in the form of jobs and wealth.

So, please, borrow sensibly. Go to a college you can afford. Avoid private student loans. And take out as few federal student loans as possible.
 
And by all means remember the Pilgrims. 

Today, Texas lawmakers could give the state's craft breweries a Texas-sized boost. They'll consider a set of bills to loosen the rules for beer makers. Texas is no pioneer in the craft beer movement. In fact, it ranks 45th in the nation in breweries per capita. But that number doesn't tell the whole story. 

To this point, the rule at Texas breweries has been "take only memories." People on a tour couldn't buy beer there. But if approved, this new legislation would let breweries sell pints. And, it would let brewpubs sell their beer to grocery stores. 

"Craft breweries in the state have a hard time getting solid footing because of the restrictions in allowing them to have access to market," says Scott Metzger, who goes by @beermonkey on Twitter, and who negotiated  the bill on behalf of craft brewers.

Metzger says Texans do drink a lot of specialized brews. It's just not beer made in Texas. And come on, there's no shortage of Texas pride.  "It just goes to show that Texans really, really want Texas products," he says. 

Nationally, states are placing fewer restrictions on craft breweries, says Jeffrey Klineman, editor-in-chief of BevNET.com. Compared to other states, he says, Texas is a little behind the curve. 

"It's a really big state, and it's got a more slowly maturing craft beer market," Klineman says.  

This law, he says, would definitely help speed that up. 

Sometimes, having a manageable amount debt can be a good thing. It's an incentive to make a budget and stick to it. Plus, it gives you a sense of responsibility. Facing your financial mistakes can even strengthen your relationships or teach you better habits. We have some listeners who have stories along these lines, and financial adviser Liz Weston talks about possible silver linings of borrowing from and lending money to people important to us.

Weston has lent members of her family money, but she does it with trepidation. She says deciding whether to give money to someone really depends on the situation.

"Almost everything that has to do with money is situational," says Weston, who has also rejected certain requests for borrowing money from members of her family before. "It's really tough to say 'no' to someone who has asked you for help."

Mind Games & Money: A guide to exploring your emotions in personal finance What role do your emotions play when it comes to making financial decisions? To help you gauge how emotional you are about money, we've put together a special grid.

Maggie in Beaverton, Ore., sent us an email with some questions about how to get control over the debt she and her husband have accrued. Combined they owe about $50,000 in student debt and she's borrowed money from her parents as well. She wants to know how to pay off what she owes while saving up to start a family through adoption or fertility treatments.

Our Facebook friend Jeff in San Francisco wrote to us about rekindling a relationship with an ex whom he separated from because of money issues. Jeff feels money is important while his ex didn't. Jeff's ex feels that he treats her like a child when it comes to money. Recently, the two have been seeing each other again and he wants advice on how to know if his partner's outlook on money has matured.

"When you're good with money, you can come off like a parent in a relationship," says Weston. "My focus in this situation would be on myself and make sure that I'm not the parent and make sure that I'm not the one dictating the terms, as it were. One of the best things to do as a couple is simply talk about what are your first memories about money, how did they handle money in your family. So many discussions that you can have."

For more advice from Weston, click play on the audio player above.

While the Senate debates comprehensive immigration reform, hordes of lobbyists are vying for attention. The Sunlight Foundation estimates as many as 3,000 lobbyists have worked on immigration issues in the past few years. There are the usual suspects -- restaurant owners, farmers, and construction groups -- and then there are the not-so-usual suspects. 

You may not expect to find lobbyists focused on immigration issues in Baltimore this weekend at the Pimlico Race Course, home to the Preakness Stakes. But the American Horse Council is lobbying Congress on immigration reform.

“Well, immigration has been an interest for a long, long time,” Jay Hickey says. He’s the group’s president.

The American Horse Council represents horse owners’ interests in Washington. The horse industry is worth $102 billion, and low-skilled workers from overseas are an important part of that.

“We use H-2A agricultural workers on a temporary basis on our breeding farms and our training facilities,” Hickey says.

Those visas are limited, and his group wants more of them. According to Hickey, these workers do jobs that are specialized and physical. Try as horse owners may -- and they do try, Hickey notes -- there aren’t many Americans who are willing do those jobs.

“You just can’t find them,” he says. “And if you can find them, they don’t want to do it, or they’re not qualified to do it.”

You’ll also find lobbyists focused on immigration issues in concert halls.

“Just like music is everywhere in our lives, it also shows up in all kinds of places in national policy,” says Heather Noonan, the League of American Orchestras’ vice president for advocacy.

Noonan says her group cares the most about what are called O&P visas, for soloists, “the non-immigrant, temporary work visas required to bring those artists into the United States to perform.”

It is her job, she says, to make sure visas for those performers are available.

“When the curtain goes up at 7:00 on Friday, the artist needs to be there, and the audience is expecting that they’ll be there.”

The League of American Orchestras is lobbying to make that visa process as efficient, affordable, and accessible as possible.

This week brought some bright news about an uptick in consumer spending -- something which might or might not mean a corresponding rise in credit card debt. Reporter Stacey Vanek Smith joins us to sort things out.

How much more are people spending in the U.S.?

Retail sales rose a tenth of a percent in April. That was a big improvement over what we saw in March, when consumer spending was actually declining.
 
Chris Christopher, director of consumer economics and demography at IHS Global Insight, says this might be a little deceptively positive.  Because of so many months spent saving and scrimping and because of worries about the fiscal cliff and other things, Americans kind of broke down and went on buying sprees.

"It looks like the consumer's doing relatively well. However, a word of caution: it's not like they're opening up the champagne bottles and splurging everywhere, it's a very targeted type of spending," says Christopher.

So what kind of things are people buying?

Americans are actually spending less on necessities -- groceries and on gas. Part of that is that gas prices are lower. What they are spending on are restaurants and a lot of home improvement type things -- Lowe's, Home Depot, some bigger purchases. In any case, we are shopping again and not just for the bare necessities.

Are people using plastic for these purchases?

You'd think so, because some of the items that were selling last month were big ones, but according to IHS Global Insight's Chris Christopher, that's not what's happening.

"What is bought on credit, is a little on the auto side," says Christopher. "However, revolving credit -- credit card debt --  has been relatively flat for a few years. In no way are we returning to our old ways any time soon."

Amanda Husberg laughs when I tell her she doesn't look like she could be seventy-three years old. “It's because I don't have a husband and I don't have kids,” she jokes.

Husberg and I are standing in the narrow hallway of her Brooklyn apartment. It's also her office space. She's remembering a scene from five years ago.

“I came here,” she tells me, “and I caught my toe at the edge of the rug. I went flying, and my right shoulder hit the chair.”

She hit the ground pretty hard, she couldn't get up on her own.

“I banged on the floor,” she says, “with SOS, bum bum bum, dum dum, bum bum bum.”

That SOS message got a neighbor's attention, and that neighbor got her to the hospital. Husberg had a broken shoulder, and ended up in a sling for four months.

Since then she's had a few more falls. She's spent $40,000 to make her home easier to get around. She also now pays for an emergency alert service, they'll send an ambulance any time she pushes the button on her wrist band. But Husberg still worries about falling again.

“My biggest fear,” she admits, “is loss of independence.”

The Center for Disease Control says every year about a third of seniors suffer from a fall. It's the most common injury that causes death for elderly people. Doctor Cathleen Colon-Emeric specializes in geriatrics at Duke University Medical Center. She says there are high costs to these falls.

“There's the cost of going to the doctor, going to the urgent care or emergency room,” she says. There are also costs for things like x-rays and stitches. Most falls add up to around ten to twenty thousand dollars. And a hip fracture?  That's about $18,000.

“And then,” Colon-Emeric tells me, “there are all the indirect costs, lost productivity, or needing more help around the home and having to have somebody else help you.”

Altogether, these losses come to around $30 billion a year in the U.S. Falls are twice as likely to happen in nursing homes. Which can lead to costly lawsuits.  

“Nursing home falls,” Colon-Emeric says, “are the second most common cause for litigation in nursing homes.”

She and her colleagues have come up with a new staff training program. It teaches how to better communicate about risky situations that can lead to falls.

“It may be monitoring their medications,” she explains, “or trying to improve their vision, or changing their environment.”

So far, nursing homes that have used her training have seen a 20 percent decline in fall rates.

A federal court has ruled that Walmart can be sued as a ‘joint employer’ of nearly two thousand temporary warehouse workers at a major Walmart distribution facility in Southern California. The catch: the workers load imported goods like toys and electronics exclusively for Walmart. But they are not employed directly by the giant retailer, nor do they receive a paycheck from the company.

With this ruling, the class-action lawsuit, Carrillo v. Schneider, becomes a milestone in the effort of workers’ advocates to push legal and financial liability for poor wages and working conditions up the retail supply chain,  to the marquee retailer at the top—in this case, Walmart.

“It’s the first joint-employer class-action that I’m aware of involving any company in that industry,” said Catherine Fisk, Chancellor’s Professor of Law at UC Irvine and an expert on employment law. “And certainly with Walmart, it involves the most high-profile retailer.”

“What it says is that since Walmart has such tremendous control over its supply chain, which is its key to its business model, Walmart has effective control over the workers unloading boxes in its warehouses,” says Fisk. “And it should be responsible for the rampant safety and wage and workplace violations in that workplace.”

The Case: Carrillo v. Schneider

The Carrillo case was brought in October 2011 on behalf of 1,800 low-skilled workers employed by temporary staffing agencies at a warehouse complex in Mira Loma, California, east of Los Angeles. The warehouse (Walmart distribution center #6060) is operated by Wisconsin-based Schneider Logistics. It is one of a series of massive warehouses nationwide that are part of Walmart’s proprietary distribution chain, though it does not own or operate them.

Workers at the Mira Loma facility have described widespread labor abuses dating back to the early 2000s. “They wouldn’t pay us overtime, so we would work sometimes from 6 a.m. in the morning to 9 p.m. or 10 p.m. at night,” says warehouse worker David Acosta, who is covered by the class-action lawsuit. “And we also had this fear that if we complained, we would often see the repercussions where our paychecks would be short during the pay period. We would sometimes notice that we would get $40 to $50 less. Most of the workers, their [immigration] status was questionable. But sometimes the supervisors would actually help falsify some of the documents.”

The California Department of Labor has investigated these and other allegations. In late 2011—prior to the lawsuit being filed—it fined the temporary employment agencies hired by Schneider Logistics more than $1 million for wage theft, retaliatory termination, and other serious violations.

Walmart and its contracted logistics companies in Southern California, Illinois and other national transportation hubs, have been battling a union-backed campaign to organize its temporary warehouse workers. The groups Warehouse Workers United (in Southern California) and Warehouse Workers for Justice (in Northern Illinois), have also been pressing state agencies to pursue workplace inspections and investigations. The groups met with Walmart executives last fall at the company’s headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, but so far do not report any progress in addressing their grievances.

Walmart as Joint Employer

Until late last year, Walmart had kept itself at arm’s length from the Carrillo case. But Judge Christina Snyder of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California has now ruled that Walmart can be added as a defendant alongside the warehouse operator and temporary staffing agencies. 

Lawyers for the plaintiffs will now have the opportunity to prove in court that Walmart exercised effective control over the warehouse, its temporary workers, and operations, and will also have the opportunity to claim that Walmart should be liable for damages that could reach into the tens of millions of dollars, says plaintiffs’ lead attorney Michael Rubin of the firm Altshuler and Berzon in San Francisco.

“One hundred percent of the goods loaded and unloaded in these warehouses are destined for Walmart distribution centers,” says Rubin. “Schneider works for Walmart. We are trying to establish as a matter of economic reality—which is the short-hand test that the courts apply—that the companies higher up in the chain bear legal responsibility, because they have the right to control what goes on on the workplace floor, and because in many instances they exercise that control.”

Rubin says there’s already strong evidence that this is true, even prior to full discovery in the case. “We do know at this point that the key managers and supervisors employed by Schneider had Walmart emails as well as Schneider emails,” says Rubin. “And we’re trying to trace what role Walmart actually played in determining how much money is available to pay the workers, what the productivity levels would have to be, what sort of quotas would be imposed and so forth.”

Rubin continued: "This ruling is significant because it establishes that a company can't avoid owing a duty of care to its workers by using layers of contractors as a buffer between itself and those who do its work."

Walmart issued the following statement in response to the judge's ruling in the case: “Today’s action merely echoes the judge’s preliminary ruling last month so, while we disagree, today’s ruling wasn’t unexpected. So far, there have been no findings of fact as to the claims made in the case nor if Walmart would be responsible for any part of those claims, if proven true. We continue to believe that Schneider Logistics and its contractors are independently responsible for managing their people and that the facts will demonstrate that Walmart is not a joint employer of the plaintiffs. That said, it is important to note that we hold all of our service providers to high standards and it is our expectation that the law is always followed.”

A spokesperson for Schneider Logistics referred Markeplace to Walmart for further comment.

In her ruling, Judge Snyder laid out what allegations Walmart will need to defend itself against in the next phase of the trial. Walmart will now need to counter the plaintiffs' claim that its warehousing contracts (with Schneider) are structured so frugally, that subcontractors are likely to violate labor and employment laws in order to deliver their service at the low cost Walmart demands. 

Agriculture, garment industry, now retail

Law professor Catherine Fisk says the case could set a significant precedent, if Walmart is indeed held liable for labor conditions of temporary workers in its contracted U.S. warehouses.

“Whoever is ultimately selling the product is in the position of forcing cost reductions down the supply chain, and they’re able to do it because they set up a bidding war among suppliers, who in turn set up a bidding war with the companies that supply labor, and the winner supplies the lowest-cost labor,” Fisk explains.

“Walmart has taken this to a whole new level of sophistication and effectiveness, to the point where every year Walmart demands that its suppliers produce goods for less money than they did the year before. It’s how they keep prices so low, by constant pressure on their suppliers. The theory of this case is that if warehouse workers in California’s Inland Empire are being paid piece-rate that works out to lower than minimum wage, for instance, Walmart’s contracting practices are forcing their contractors to do that, so Walmart should be responsible as a joint employer for those safety, wages and working conditions.”

Similar joint-employer theories have been used effectively in the past to press liability onto large corporations at the top of the supply chain in other industries where labor-subcontracting is rampant. These include the garment industry and agriculture, and more recently, janitorial services for commercial buildings. Fisk says this case pushes the strategy into the massive and lucrative U.S. retail industry for the first time.

Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld published his memoir, “Known and Unknown” in 2011. His latest book, “Rumsfeld’s Rules” suggests he still has lessons to share after a lifetime in politics and business.

The book is a collection of advice that he started collecting through a habit taught to him by his schoolteacher mother.

“If I didn’t know a word she’d say, 'Well write it down and look it up,'" he says. "Then I started writing down various other thoughts and rules and anecdotes.”

The anecdotes Rumsfeld recounts are pulled from his time in office with the Bush, Reagan and Nixon administrations.

Three of many Rumsfeld Rules in the book:

It’s easier to get into something than it is to get out.

“I thought of that when I was President Reagan’s Middle East envoy and we had 241 Marines killed at Beirut, at the airport. And I concluded then that the United States has to be careful about putting ground forces in because we’re such a big target. And I also over the years came to the conclusion over the years that the United States really was organized, trained and equipped to do nation-building.”

Rumsfeld says this was on his mind as the United States entered Afghanistan and Iraq. “When you do something, then someone wants you to do something else and then something else and then over time, the mission, historically, creeps into something else that was initiated at the outset.”

But in the end, “it’s not easy for countries to evolve and grow but I think that both of those countries are a whale of a lot better off than they were before.”

“I’ve been mistaken so many times I don’t even blush for it anymore.” – Napoleon

“You see things that don’t turn out the way you hoped.”

Monitor progress through metrics.

“I think that history over time will probably be a better judge than you or I, but I’ve been struck by the amount of criticism that the Bush administration has received and President Bush personally and the attempts to assign blame to him and I think it’s probably not going to sort out that way.”

He says President Bush’s decision to enter Iraq is “something that over time will be better understood.”

AUDIO EXTRA: Kai Ryssdal asks Donald Rumsfeld about a reputation for not tolerating dissent.

When companies pack up and abandon places like apartment complexes, gas stations, factories, and rail yards, those properties often become what’s known as a brownfield.

Cleaning them up has become the focus of cities big and small.

This week, folks in Brownfield redevelopment from all over the nation are in Atlanta for the 2013 Brownfields Conference.  

And it’s no accident they picked Atlanta. The old railroad town is in the midst of a huge rebirth, spawned by a 22-mile system of trails, parks, and transit known as the BeltLine.

It’s been called “Atlanta’s best idea.” And it’s also one of the nation’s most successful brownfield clean-up stories.

“This most certainly is a Brownfield -- this was a Brownfield, I should say,” says Lee Harrop as he looks around a busy section of trailway in the northeast part of Atlanta known as the Old 4th Ward.

Amid the skyline views and park-like setting, bicyclists and runners create a steady stream of passers-by.

But this very area was a rail corridor for more than a century. And until about a year ago, it was a desolate area of urban blight.

“People call this the Hobo Highway,” says Harrop. “It was a source of dumping. It was a source of homelessness.  It was a source of really not what you wanted to see in the city.”

WhenBeltLine officials started sampling soil to find out what it would take to clean up this area, they discovered a toxic soup of contaminants in the soil, including arsenic, pesticides and dry cleaning solvents.

“It was a wasteland,” confirms Jenny Everett, who lives in the neighborhood and remembers how she avoided the area at all costs.

Now, she runs along the trail three times a week.

Everett says she was skeptical when she heard what the BeltLine would do to the Old 4th Ward neighborhood.  But color her skeptical no more.

“The place is packed,” Everett says as she walks along the Northeast Trail.  “You have every possible type person out on this BeltLine, from mothers strolling their children to guys and girls walking their dogs to runners and bicyclists. It serves a lot of purposes for a lot of different people.”

None of this comes cheap.

For this two square-mile section of trail and adjoining park, the price tag was $63 million. But that’s spawned three-quarters of a billion dollars in redevelopment, BeltLine officials say.

It’s likely developers wouldn’t have touched this place with a 10-foot railroad spike if the city, state and federal governments hadn’t shouldered the cost of  cleanup.

And this story isn’t unique to Atlanta -- it’s the same in every U.S. city.

“There’s sometimes could be situations where you say that you’ve just got to pass,” says Janine Betsey, a developer who heads the King Park Area Development Corporation in Indianapolis.  

Betsey says brownfield cleanup can get expensive. And without a little help taxpayers, developers sometimes won’t take the risk.  If that seems unfair, she says consider what would happen if cities don’t clean up brownfield sites.   

“Contamination can leak into drinking water and other things throughout the community. So you’re really preserving the health of the entire community and not just cleaning up a property,” says Betsey.

Much of the money for cleanup comes from federal Environmental Protection Agency grants and loan funds a lot of this. The EPA  has spent tens of millions of dollars in some cases to clean up so-called “superfund” sites. But often, brownfield clean-ups are only a few thousand dollars says Mathy Stanislaus, an assistant administrator with the EPA.  

“Because you’re able to quantify the relatively manageable cost,” says Stanislaus. “You can quickly conduct any necessary cleanup and redevelop the site.”

So what used to be seen as a brown liability is suddenly becoming a green opportunity.

Governments have struggled over how to deal with the digital currency bitcoin, which is popular globally but not regulated by any central bank. Washington just made its first move against the currency by seizing funds in a U.S. account used for bitcoin transactions.

Let's take a step back first, since bitcoin baffles more than just government officials. You know about the stock exchange, right? It’s where people buy and sell shares of companies.

Well, bitcoins are bought and sold on exchanges too, like Mt.Gox, an online trading site based in Tokyo. And while bitcoins might be “virtual” money, it takes cold, hard cash to buy them. Transactions are handled by payment networks such as Dwolla, which is similar to PayPal or Western Express. Dwolla takes your money and sends it to an American unit of Mt.Gox.

As Georgetown University business professor Jim Angel says, “think of Dwolla as a link in the payment chain.”

The weak link, perhaps. The Department of Homeland Security froze funds in the Dwolla account of Mt.Gox's U.S. unit, alleging that it had broken the law.

“The law says if you are handling money for other people you need to say so,” notes Helen Popper, a professor at Santa Clara University’s School of Business.

But the U.S. unit of Mt.Gox didn't disclose that. Popper says the the law governing money-service businesses is designed to ensure money isn’t being laundered by drug dealers, terrorists or other criminals. With more than $1 billion of bitcoins in circulation, there’s reason for concern.

Popper says the government's action could put a chill on bitcoin’s business. Anyone trading through American accounts might fear having their money seized by the Feds and advocates for the development of digital-cash fret that Washington wants to shut down bitcoin in the United States.

“My concern," says Jerry Brito, a researcher at George Mason University, "is that certain policy makers will overreact to the potential of bitcoin to be used for bad purposes.”

Brito says the real test will be whether the government will allow a bitcoin money service to register legally.

Correction: In an earlier version of the radio story, Jerry Brito's name was misstated.

Another day and more news out of everyone's favorite tax agency. Less than 24 hours after canning the last one, President Barack Obama named White House budget official Daniel Werfel as the new acting head of the Internal Revenue Service.

Suffice it to say, this hasn't been a great week for the IRS -- what with reports IRS functionaries targeted conservative groups that had applied for tax-exempt status with extra scrutiny.  It's a scandal the likes of which the IRS hasn't seen in decades, and it's shed light on an agency that wasn't in great shape to begin with. 

The IRS is a far cry from what it used to be in the 1960s, says Lloyd Mayer, who teaches tax law at Notre Dame.

“The IRS was often held up as a model government agency, a place you wanted to work,” he says.

He and other experts I talked to, including someone who recently left the IRS, told me morale there is low. For one thing, the agency is understaffed.

“There is an enormous number of IRS managers -- soon to approach more than half of them -- who are eligible for retirement,” Mayer says.

Of course, a scandal’s not going to help recruitment. NYU Law Professor Daniel Shaviro says staffing is just one part of the problem.

“The IRS is scandalously underfunded,” he says. “And it’s all out of politics.”

The agency’s budget has fallen by a billion dollars since 2010. If it got more money, the IRS could do more enforcement. But lawmakers know the prospect of more audits probably wouldn’t thrill constituents. So, like many regulatory agencies, the IRS has been forced to do more with less.

Howard Gleckman is with the Tax Policy Center. He says the IRS is under-resourced and overwhelmed, and it’s developed “a culture of secrecy.”

“The agency that expects 150 million taxpayers to fully disclose everything about their lives is unwilling to disclose very much at all about what it does,” he says.

And that’s more than just collecting taxes. “There are huge portions of the Internal Revenue code that really are about public policy,” says John Colombo, who teaches at the University of Illinois College of Law.

Like tax deductions to incentivize behavior, including home ownership. It also has to determine which groups should be tax-exempt and which shouldn’t. And if that’s not enough, the IRS will have to enforce the president’s new health care law.

Colombo says the IRS’ new commissioner has to focus on restoring the agency’s credibility.

No one’s ever going to like the IRS, he says. (We are talking about taxes here.) But it has to be respected.

There's a new scientific paper out that's gotten a whole lot of attention. Scientists in Oregon have learned how to turn human skin cells into embryonic stem cells.

It's a development that raises once again the prospect of human cloning and so comes loaded with questions -- scientific, moral, legal and financial.

Will the results of this new experiment lead to more stem cell investment? You’d think a breakthrough like this would have venture capitalists lining up to cash in on turning cells into nearly any organ in the human body. But Greg Bonfiglio, managing partner of the firm Proteus, says private investors have been burned before.

“When you lose a lot of money or when a nuclear bomb goes off in your portfolio, you typically stay away from that sector,” he says.

Making things even trickier for investors is that stem cell research is politically hot. With all the bio-ethical debates around cloning, it’s been harder to get your hands on money.

Tim Kamp oversees the Regenerative Medicine Center at the University of Wisconsin. He works on the heart.

“For example, one of the main supporters of cardiovascular research in the American Heart Association. And they’ve made a policy decision that they’d rather pass on funding human embryonic stem cell research,” he says.

Kamp says much of his funding has come from the federal government. Since 2002, the National Institutes of Health has spent several billion dollars on human stem cell research. The NIH’s Story Landis expects Washington will continue to invest, but at the same pace despite this new research.

“It’s a technological achievement. But is it going to change the strategies and opportunities that we have, no,” she says.

But Greg Bonfiglio says this advance may change the strategy for venture capitalists.

“Assume the technology is accurate, that they have now made this breakthrough. The next step in the process to bringing that breakthrough from bench to bedside is to commercialize it,” he says.

And even with all those past losses, Bonfiglio the money is going to come.  

Disappointed by the latest economic indicators out today? Blame the weather. Walmart sales are down and so are housing starts, but that could be because retailers had to do a lot of heavy discounting in response to unseasonably cold spring weather. Snowstorms bombarded parts of the East Coast and Colorado in late March. 

Plus, the Cannes Film Festival is under way, and though Angelina Jolie won't be there, her star power will. The attention her mastectomy has brought to hereditary breast cancer is creating buzz for a film that will be screened Saturday.

And, in Mexico, a look at how social media outlets such as Twitter are being used by the public to battle public corruption.

NASA's Kepler space telescope searches for Earth-like planets. But this week, equipment failure means the $600-million Kepler is in "thruster-controlled safe mode," and may never fully operate again.

How much space exploration does $600 million buy? Is it worth it?

NASA’s budget is smaller than it used to be, but it’s still galaxy-sized -- about $17 billion a year. Which makes the budget for the Kepler telescope look pretty small in comparison. But what exactly do we get for $600 million? Bobby Braun, a professor of space systems at the Georgia Institute of Technology and former NASA chief technologist, says that amount is just about right for turning scientific dreams into reality.

“Five years ago when I would look up at the night sky, I would think to myself there has to be  a planet out there somewhere," Braun says. "There are so many stars…But I didn’t know that to be true. I just believed it.”

Now Braun says Kepler’s findings over the past four-plus years are going to change textbooks. The telescope has identified close to 3,000 candidates for planets and confirmed over 100. And while the dreamers and astrophysicists would love to continue the search, thanks to a broken wheel the Kepler mission’s future is cloudy.

John Logsdon, a professor emeritus at George Washington University’s Space Policy Institute, says that’s simply the price of doing business far, far away from earth and satellite-repairing engineers.

“When you put things in space they are tricky things to operate and eventually they wear out,” he says.

But Logsdon notes that Kepler’s broken wheel isn’t a case of premature failure. NASA says that the telescope has already outlived its expected life of four years. And the space agency says it still may find a fix. So what would be lost if the Kepler can’t continue its search? Logsdon says we’d lose more data.

“And scientists love data, because data leads to discoveries.”

Both Logsdon and NASA say there’s so much data from the mission already, it will take scientists years to analyze it.

The economic news out of Tokyo overnight was pretty good. The economy there grew at what you can fairly call a booming 3.5 percent annual rate last quarter. Nifty in and of itself -- downright awesome when you remember Japan's lost decades.

Credit -- most of it, anyway -- goes to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who took office in December with an policy prescription that's come to be known as 'Abenomics.'

'Abenomics,' says BBC Correspondent Rupert Wingfield-Hayes, isn't really about doing anything new, but combining two well-known strategies: Government spending, especially funding for public works; and the Bank of Japan printing a huge amount of money.

Those two moves have helped the Japanese stock market skyrocket, while at the same time pushing down the value of the yen. This was the desired effect for the government, says Wingfield-Hayes, because it wants Japanese companies to be able to export their goods at lower prices.

So far the plan seems to be working. Public sentiment is much more positive than it was in years past, and consumer spending is up.

Still, this kind of pace can't last forever.

"There are real dangers in this," says Wingfield-Hayes, "because while exporters like it, importers hate it." Japan imports a lot of food and almost all of its energy, he points out, and those rising prices will eventually affect Japanese consumers.

"This is a balancing act," adds Wingfield-Hayes. "It if goes too far, it's going to cause a lot of problems."

For a society that has struggled for the last few decades, change can be difficult.

"People want change," he says. "This has been a very comfortable country, a country where the people have been looked after by the system and change is frightening."

The biggest employer in America reports that sales are down, and there were some other less-than thrilling numbers out today.

The reason? The weather, reports Dianne Swonk of Mesirow Financial.

"A lot of retailers had to do a lot of heavy discounting in response to the weather, particularly in March," she said.

Temperatures were down across much of the United States, causing consumers to huddle at home instead of going out.

"No one was really out there buying Easter bonnets," Swonk said.

April proved to be somewhat better, but not by much.

In housing numbers there was also a downward turn, almost entirely in the South, Swonk said. Weather, again, might be to blame. 

All in all? The rose colored glasses of the first quarter may have come off.

"The US economy has moderated after a strong start to the year," she said.

BP wants some help. They're asking the British prime minister to help them stem the rising cost of compensation from the Gulf Oil spill.

What's their beef?

They claim they're being ripped off by an army of lawyers down there in the South.

Claims being made are inflated, BP says and "totally undeserved," even coming from companies that weren't affected at all.

The problem lies in the proof. Businesses only have to show that they made less profit than usual, or less after the spill. 

Malcolm Bracken, oil analyst from Redmayne Bentley, says that move proved BP has been rather dumb.

"The problem is they've written a blank check to Louisiana and not asked them to prove causality," Bracken says.

BP said they were just trying to make it for easier for claimants, but now they're in over their heads. The company has launched an appeal and if that fails, they want the prime minister to intervene with the White House.

BP is getting hammered because it's a foreign company, even though there are certainly more American employees these days.

Insanity. That's how Senator Harry Reid is characterizing yet another attempt by House Republicans to repeal President Barack Obama's healthcare initiative.

In remarks on the senate floor yesterday, Reid used Albert Einstein's definition of insane as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Reid says not only is it not going to go anywhere. All these tries to knock down the law are costing taxpayers big money -- around $52.4 million in Reid's estimation. 

But Daniel Scarpinato disagrees. He is press secretary for the National Republican Congressional Committee. "With all due respect to Harry Reid, Obamacare is what is creating costs on taxpayers, and we're trying to stop that," Scarpinato says.

Kathryn Pearson teaches political science at the University of Minnesota. She says these repeal attempts are purely symbolic. And yes, they do cost money.

"That said there are a lot of things that both the House and the Senate do that cost money that aren't intended to produce results," Pearson Says.

Call it the cost of doing business on Capital Hill.

While Mexico is by no means the only place on Earth where public corruption runs rampant, the problem continues to plague its citizens in a country where 93 percent of driversthink their traffic cops are corrupt.

Marketplace Morning Report host David Brancaccio talks to León Krauze of Univision News about how social media outlets such as Twitter have sprung up as tools used by the public to battle public corruption.