Massive security breaches at Target and Neiman Marcus last year put millions of customers at risk of identity theft and credit card fraud. In light of these major rifts in consumer secuity, Federal Trade Commission chair Edith Ramirez is urging Congress to adopt several new rules to better protect consumer data such as credit card information, usernames and passwords.
"What we are seeking is that there are robust security requirements as well as a national breach notice requirement," said Ramirez. "We'd also like any national legislation to include FTC enforcement with a civil penalty."
States currently enforce their own regulations when it comes to notifying customers of a breach in security. According to Ramirez, a federal requirement would benefit shoppers across state lines as well as aid law enforcement in prosecuting cybercrime.
"It's critical that consumers receive reasonably prompt notification so that they can take whatever steps they need if there has been a breach and their consumer information has been exposed," said Ramirez.
Several senators have introduced similar legislation to congress, but the bill has not moved out of committee. In the meantime, Ramirez says she hopes the FTC can fill the void of Congress. She added that the market also plays a significant role in determining privacy measures.
"Consumers are increasingly demanding adequate protection for their information both in terms of data security and larger privacy questions," said Ramirez.
This story is part of a collaboration with Slate called “The Secret Life of a Food Stamp.”
When Stephanie Ballam finishes her shift at a Walmart Super Center near Columbus, Ohio, she sometimes picks up a few groceries—items she might have put on the shelves herself hours before: a box of oatmeal, a can or two of mini ravioli.
At the checkout, first she swipes her Walmart employee card to get her store discount. Then, because she doesn’t earn enough money at her job to make ends meet, she will often pay for the groceries with food stamps, using her Electronic Benefits Transfer card. Eventually, that money will show up in Walmart’s annual earnings report as sales.
Ballam, 31, is glad to have her job at Walmart. She currently works there full-time and just recently got a raise to $9.10 an hour; she thinks the raise might be enough to disqualify her from the food stamp program, though the state hasn’t processed the paperwork yet. For now—and for the last three years since she’s worked at Walmart, plus a few months before that when she was unemployed—food stamps have helped her survive. Back when Walmart first hired her and she found out how much she would be making, hearing the number was “like being punched,” Ballam says. Her starting hourly wage was $7.25. As for food stamps, “I knew that I would still need those services,” Ballam says.
So how typical is Stephanie Ballam's situation? The federal government doesn't keep nationwide data on how many workers at Walmart—or any other company—are on food stamps, which are officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). SNAP is available to people living at or near the poverty line; for a single person like Stephanie Ballam, that means an annual income less than about $15,000 a year.
Walmart is the largest employer in the U.S., so its work force is bound to reflect the country’s economic realities.
Although there are no federal numbers on where employed SNAP participants work, the state of Ohio, where Ballam lives, does keep a list of the top 50 companies with the most workers and their family members on food stamps. Ohio’s list includes lots of fast food chains, discount and big-box stores: McDonalds, Target, Kroger Supermarket, Dollar General. At the very top is Walmart, which had a monthly average of more than 14,500 workers and family members on food stamps last year. If you take into account the average size of a family on food stamps, as many as 7,000 individual Walmart employees were on food stamps last year—nearly 15 percent of the company’s work force across Ohio.
That means the same company that brings in the most food stamp dollars in revenue—an estimated $13 billion last year—also likely has the most employees using food stamps.
“I think it's troubling that any American has to turn to a program like that, but the fact is, they do,” says David Tovar, Walmart’s vice president of communications. I met him at the company headquarters in Bentonville, Ark. where the wall behind the front desk has giant painted letters that spell out the company motto: Save money. Live better.
The front desk at Wal-mart's corporate headquarters in Benton, Ark.
The front desk at Wal-mart's corporate headquarters in Benton, Ark.
“We would love nothing more than a day when we didn't have to have programs like that,” Tovar continues. “But for now, with the economy the way it is, with customers continuing to struggle the way they are, I think it's really important to be able to help people along the way.”
When looking at the number of Walmart employees on food stamps in Ohio and elsewhere, Tovar stresses the importance of perspective: Walmart is the largest employer in Ohio, and the country, he points out, so its work force is bound to reflect the country’s current economic realities, including growing rates of food stamp use.
Tovar also quotes a line other Walmart executives have used before him: “It’s really not where you start; it's where you end up.”
But there was a time not so long ago when where you started—even in an entry-level job—could afford you a much different life right at the outset. And that brings us to the Hudson family.
Let's start with Adam Hudson, age 21. Last summer he got a job at a Walmart Super Center in Dayton as a hardware associate, stocking shelves, organizing displays and helping customers, making $8.25 an hour.
Adam Hudson works at Walmart for $8.25 an hour. He brought home $488.60 for 75.5 hours worth of work.
Adam Hudson, 21, at his mobile home in Ohio.
Until then, he had a pretty low opinion of the food stamp program. “I'd always considered people who use food stamps as just taking advantage of the government,” Hudson says, because they “weren't working hard enough to be able to afford for themselves.”
But at Walmart, Hudson saw lots of his co-workers working hard and still needing SNAP. One day after he returned home from work, he was talking with his fiancée, who was pregnant. “She had mentioned that she was hungry—hadn't been able to eat that day,” he told me. “I kept trying to suggest things we could do, like calling my mom or my dad for a little bit of help…It dawned on us that we can't afford to feed ourselves and make sure all of our bills are paid and have a car with gas to get to work every day.” A few weeks after Walmart hired him, Hudson enrolled in the food stamp program.
Compare Adam’s situation to that of his father, Jim Hudson, who has never been on food stamps in his life. Back when Jim was a young man, his life was in many ways very similar to his son’s: He was starting a family and looking for a job he could get with no college degree. The plentiful work was not in retail, but manufacturing. Jim got hired at what was, back then, the largest employer in Ohio and the country: not Walmart, but General Motors.
Jim Hudson says his starting wage in 1991 at a GM factory near Dayton, building Trail Blazers, was $9.35 an hour, which in inflation-adjusted 2014 dollars comes out to $16.12 per hour—almost twice what his son makes now. Adam Hudson says he would love a job at the GM plant where his dad worked. It shut down in 2008.
Adam and Jim Hudson at Adam's home in Ohio.
Back when GM was still Ohio's largest employer, it would not have ranked as a top food stamp employer. It may not have had any workers—even entry-level workers—on food stamps at all.
“Those workers would have earned too much to qualify for the program,” says James Ziliak, an economist at the University of Kentucky who has been looking at the way food stamp enrollment has changed in the last 30 years. One of the starkest changes is the increase in people who have steady jobs, either part-time or full-time, but still use food stamps because they earn so little. According to Ziliak’s analysis of census data, these days about 24 percent of households on food stamps are headed by people working year-round. That’s up from just 15 percent in 1980.
Put another way, one of the big drivers of food stamp growth in the last few decades is the difference between Jim Hudson’s job at GM and his son’s job at Walmart.
Back when manufacturing was still king, “wages would grow, prices would grow, but wages would grow faster than prices,” Ziliak says. “So people were actually making real increases in their standard of living.” Those increases drove the consumer economy.
Today, in an economy fueled by the retail and service industries, companies try to stay competitive by keeping prices down. “One way to do that is to make sure their wages are kept in control,” Ziliak told me. “But that also has a feedback effect, because if wages aren't rising, that means many families have less spending money, which means they have less cash to spend, maybe even at their own employers' stores.” Food stamps help fill that spending gap for Walmart and other companies.
But as helpful as food stamps may be—as an economic stimulus and a support for low-wage jobs—when you talk to workers who have used them to supplement their income, their feelings can be complicated.
“I’m not proud that I was on assistance, but I had to provide for my family—and I am so thankful for my job now, because I’m off of it” says Mary Burkett, 26, who until recently was a store manager at Dollar General. At that job, she made about $28,500 a year—little enough that she and her husband, who is unemployed, and their two children qualified for food stamps. (Based on state numbers from Ohio, nearly 40% of Dollar General workers there are enrolled in SNAP.) But then Burkett was hired as an assistant manager for a Walmart supercenter in the Dayton suburb of Huber Heights, where she earns $43,000 a year. When she found out her new salary, Burkett says, she literally cut up her food stamp card.
“I was so happy,” she told me. “I knew with the amount I was making that I would be able to provide insurance for my kids, and put food on the table, and I wouldn't need everything I was on before.”
But not everyone is able to work their way off food stamps. Tera, who asked not to use her last name for fear of risking her job, has been at an Ohio Walmart for four years and now makes $10 an hour. She lives with her son and his father, who was laid off from the industrial adhesives factory where he used to work and has not yet found a new job. Tera’s family was on food stamps when she started at Walmart, and they are still are on food stamps now.
Tera has heard the criticisms of food stamps—that they're a drain on taxpayer dollars. “I don’t really pay attention to them,” she says, “because I work for my food stamps.”
Tera brings her Walmart groceries inside.
All photos by Krissy Clark.
Additional reporting and production on this story from Jolie Myers and Martha Little.
Thirty-seven percent of New Yorkers faced severe material hardship last year, but the city's official poverty rate is only 21 percent. Researchers are trying to find a better way to measure poverty.
Microsoft, what took you so long?
“It’s a question,” David Smith, an analyst at Gartner says, “you could ask about an awful lot about Microsoft in the past ten years.”
But what is clear, says Smith, is that now Microsoft is working to stay competitive with Apple and Google. Which is why Microsoft's voice-recognition system may be significant.
"I don't think it will make a big difference, but I think it's more if it was missing, it's a noticeable difference," says Norman Young, an equity analyst with Morningstar.
Young says although Microsoft's product, called Cortana, may look and work a little differently than Siri. But both interfaces use Bing, Microsoft’s search engine, so developers should have an easy time making Window’s new digital assistant better and better.
Here's a supposedly leaked video of the product:
A growing economy doesn't always help everyone.
"One thing is a society where the middle class is growing," says economist Julian Messina, with the World Bank. "And a different thing is a society where inequality is falling."
The middle class is on the agenda of the World Economic Forum on Latin America, now underway in Panama. But unlike in the U.S., the gap between rich and poor in Latin America has narrowed. And the middle class has grown.
That’s largely due to economic growth, with help from assistance programs that promote social advancement.
"And these are notable because they give subsidies to poor families, but they're conditional upon sending children to school and vaccinating children," says Barbara Kotschwar with the Peterson Institute for International Economics.